Angelina Jolie, the celebrated actress and humanitarian, has sparked widespread discussion with reports of her decision to disinherit five of her six children. The news has left many people, especially those aged 45 to 65, questioning the reasoning behind such a bold move. This article explores the story behind Jolie’s inheritance plan and its potential impact on her family.
At the center of this decision is Maddox, Jolie’s eldest son, who is reportedly set to inherit her entire $116 million fortune. According to sources, Maddox played a pivotal role in supporting Jolie during her emotionally taxing divorce from Brad Pitt. Out of all her children, Maddox stood by her side, offering unwavering assistance during one of the most challenging periods of her life. From Jolie’s perspective, rewarding his loyalty seems like a natural choice.
However, this decision has not been without controversy. Brad Pitt, Jolie’s ex-husband, is said to be deeply troubled by the unequal treatment of their children. He views the favoritism toward Maddox as problematic, fearing it could create resentment and division within the family. For Pitt, fairness means ensuring that all six children share equally in their mother’s wealth, rather than placing the burden of such a vast fortune on one child.
The Jolie-Pitt family has faced numerous challenges over the years, particularly during their high-profile divorce. The couple’s separation in 2016 was marked by intense legal battles and disagreements over custody arrangements. Tensions escalated further when allegations surfaced involving an incident between Pitt and Maddox. Although no charges were filed against Pitt, the event left lingering resentment, complicating an already strained relationship between him and Jolie.
Pitt remains frustrated by what he perceives as unfairness in Jolie’s inheritance plan. While he acknowledges Maddox’s support for his mother, he believes the other children should not be overlooked. In his view, excluding them from the inheritance risks undermining their sense of belonging and security. This ongoing disagreement highlights the complexities of co-parenting after a contentious divorce, even for families with immense resources.
As the situation develops, it raises important questions about family dynamics and the responsibilities that come with wealth. The fallout from Jolie’s alleged decision could shape her family’s relationships for years to come. Ultimately, this story serves as a poignant reminder that fame and fortune do not shield families from the challenges of navigating love, loyalty, and fairness.
